[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":90},["ShallowReactive",2],{"work-sample-retrofit":3},{"id":4,"title":5,"body":6,"client":66,"description":60,"extension":67,"featured":68,"gallery":69,"image":70,"industry":71,"meta":72,"metrics":73,"navigation":80,"path":81,"seo":82,"services":83,"stem":86,"summary":87,"year":88,"__hash__":89},"work\u002Fen\u002Fwork\u002Fsample-retrofit.md","Legacy Line Retrofit",{"type":7,"value":8,"toc":59},"minimark",[9,20,25,32,36,41,45],[10,11,12],"blockquote",{},[13,14,15,19],"p",{},[16,17,18],"strong",{},"Note:"," This is a placeholder case study to demonstrate the template. Replace with a real project when available.",[21,22,24],"h2",{"id":23},"challenge","Challenge",[13,26,27,31],{},[28,29,30],"span",{},"PLACEHOLDER"," An existing palletizing line was underperforming; the client wanted improvement without buying new robots.",[21,33,35],{"id":34},"solution","Solution",[13,37,38,40],{},[28,39,30],{}," We reprogrammed the cells, optimized paths, and retuned safety zones — no new hardware.",[21,42,44],{"id":43},"results","Results",[46,47,48,54],"ul",{},[49,50,51,53],"li",{},[28,52,30],{}," 25% cycle-time reduction",[49,55,56,58],{},[28,57,30],{}," Zero new hardware required",{"title":60,"searchDepth":61,"depth":61,"links":62},"",2,[63,64,65],{"id":23,"depth":61,"text":24},{"id":34,"depth":61,"text":35},{"id":43,"depth":61,"text":44},"Confidential","md",false,null,"\u002Fimages\u002Fsample-retrofit.jpg","material-handling",{},[74,77],{"value":75,"label":76},"25%","cycle-time reduction",{"value":78,"label":79},"0","new hardware required",true,"\u002Fen\u002Fwork\u002Fsample-retrofit",{"title":5,"description":60},[84,85],"programming","consulting","en\u002Fwork\u002Fsample-retrofit","SAMPLE — A representative controls and programming retrofit.",2024,"YeDVrmLRYuiY5TyXA_jtmL-Ki-9ojcSuPgwWG9k5xo8",1782107280666]